3D Rage IIC PCI
VS
Intel HD Graphics 530
3D Rage IIC PCI
VS
Intel HD Graphics 530

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards 3D Rage IIC PCI and Intel HD Graphics 530. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
653
Rage 2
Architecture
Gen. 9 Skylake
no data
Code name
Skylake GT2
no data
Type
Laptop
1 September 1996 (25 years ago)
Release date
5 August 2015 (6 years ago)
no data
Price now
$526
no data
Value for money
0.69
Rage 2
GPU code name
Skylake GT2
Desktop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between 3D Rage IIC PCI and Intel HD Graphics 530 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

no data
Pipelines
192
60 MHz
Core clock speed
350 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
no data
Transistor count
189 million
500 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
0.06
Texture fill rate
27.60
no data
Floating-point performance
403.2 gflops
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
24
no data
Boost clock speed
1150 MHz
5 million
Number of transistors
189 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
15 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the 3D Rage IIC PCI and Intel HD Graphics 530.

PCI
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics 3D Rage IIC PCI and Intel HD Graphics 530 can be seen in this section.

SDR
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4
2 MB
Maximum RAM amount
64 GB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
83 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
664.0 MB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
no data
Shared memory
+

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards 3D Rage IIC PCI and Intel HD Graphics 530, the size and number of monitors.

1x VGA
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

The difference between 3D Rage IIC PCI and Intel HD Graphics 530 is the additional functionality.

no data
Quick Sync
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is 3D Rage IIC PCI and Intel HD Graphics 530. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

5.0
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
Vulkan
+
no data
Shader Model
6.4
N/A
OpenCL
2.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for 3D Rage IIC PCI and Intel HD Graphics 530 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the 3D Rage IIC PCI or Intel HD Graphics 530 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) 3D Rage IIC PCI
Intel HD Graphics 530
Death Stranding (2020) 3D Rage IIC PCI
Intel HD Graphics 530
F1 2020 (2020) 3D Rage IIC PCI
Intel HD Graphics 530
Gears Tactics (2020) 3D Rage IIC PCI
Intel HD Graphics 530
Doom Eternal (2020) 3D Rage IIC PCI
Intel HD Graphics 530
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of 3D Rage IIC PCI

There is no accountable advantage

Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 530

5.64% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 500 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (64 GB vs 2 MB)

So, 3D Rage IIC PCI or Intel HD Graphics 530?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel HD Graphics 530 .

3D Rage IIC PCI versus Intel HD Graphics 530 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score 3D Rage IIC PCI
5.0 Out of 3 CpusData Score Intel HD Graphics 530