NVIDIA Quadro M2000
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K2200
NVIDIA Quadro M2000
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K2200

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro M2000 and NVIDIA Quadro K2200. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

303
Place in performance rating
330
15.21
Value for money (0-100)
33.27
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
GM206
Code name
GM107
Workstation
Type
Workstation
8 April 2016 (5 years ago)
Release date
22 July 2014 (7 years ago)
$437.75
Launch price (MSRP)
$395.75
$680 (1.6x MSRP)
Price now
$261 (0.7x MSRP)
6.14
Value for money
7.66
GM206
GPU code name
GM107
Workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro M2000 and NVIDIA Quadro K2200 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

768
Pipelines
640
796 MHz
Core clock speed
1046 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
2,940 million
Transistor count
1,870 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
75 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
68 Watt
55.82
Texture fill rate
44.96
1,812 gflops
Floating-point performance
1,439 gflops
768
Pipelines / CUDA cores
640
1163 MHz
Boost clock speed
1124 MHz
2,940 million
Number of transistors
1,870 million
75 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
68 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro M2000 and NVIDIA Quadro K2200.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
201 mm
Length
202 mm
None
Supplementary power connectors
None
1" (2.5 cm)
Width
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro M2000 and NVIDIA Quadro K2200 can be seen in this section.

128 Bit
Memory type
GDDR5
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
6612 MHz
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
80.19 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro M2000 and NVIDIA Quadro K2200, the size and number of monitors.

DP DP DP DP
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
4
Number of simultaneous displays
no data

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA Quadro M2000 and NVIDIA Quadro K2200 is the additional functionality.

5.2
CUDA
no data
+
3D Vision Pro
no data
+
Mosaic
no data
+
nView Desktop Management
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro M2000 and NVIDIA Quadro K2200. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.5
OpenGL
4.6
+
Vulkan
+
5
Shader Model
no data
1.2
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro M2000 and NVIDIA Quadro K2200 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro M2000 or NVIDIA Quadro K2200 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro M2000
NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro M2000
NVIDIA Quadro K2200
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro M2000
NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro M2000
NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro M2000
NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M2000

1.83% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (768 vs 640)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Cheaper ($261 (0.7x MSRP) vs $680 (1.6x MSRP))

Less power consumption (68 Watt vs 75 Watt)

So, NVIDIA Quadro M2000 or NVIDIA Quadro K2200?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro M2000 .

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 versus NVIDIA Quadro K2200 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro M2000
5.0 Out of 1 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro K2200